Showing posts with label Calgary Sales. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Calgary Sales. Show all posts

Saturday, March 12, 2011

Calgary Stats Feb 2011

After a slow start in January sales have picked up in February. Even with this increase they are still below the pace set in the 2nd half of 2009 shown in green in the chart below. It will be interesting to see how much the new mortgage rules will slow sales after March 17. I believe the impact of this change has been overstated because it is a marginal reduction of the size of a mortgage allowed and only effects those who were going to their affordability limit with the maximum amortization. (It is a positive change long term and if you are a buyer rushing to get a 35 year am - don't do it. Get a shorter amortization later when you can afford it.)


New listing have ramped up at the start of 2011. This stat will be important to watch over the next few months. Will we have a higher than normal surge this spring similar to last year?


Seasonally adjusted sales have remain higher compared to late last spring but nowhere near the pace of the boom of 2006-2007.



Seasonally adjusted new listings have increased consistently since reaching a low in October 2010.



So far in 2011 the sales to new listings ration has dropped below 50% due to new listings rising more than sales on a seasonally adjusted basis.

Since December the median price (Old Criteria) has increased from $342,500 to $357,250. I believe that sales mix and seasonal factors contribute to this so to give further insight I hope to add seasonally adjusted price charts shortly. The same goes for total inventory as well which has increased from 6,056 to 7,517.

Friday, March 19, 2010

More on February sales

In the Edmonton Journal there was an article discussing the sales increase in February.

Alberta house sales buck national slide
Resales up 1.6 per cent provincially, versus 1.5-per-cent decline Canada-wide

The reference here is to seasonally adjusted gain from January to February. As I pointed out in this previous post the sharp slowdown in January on a seasonally adjusted basis contributed to elevated February comparison. Even with this increase factored in home sales in Calgary and Edmonton are still relatively slow.

It appears for March the rate of sales will still be low historically. From Mike Fotiou's stats the first 17 days of March had 705 SFH and 308 condo sales. Extrapolating this to the end of the month gives an estimated 1285 SFH and 561 condo sales. This will be above the rate of sales during the financial crisis but below 2008 and well below boom years.

Bob Truman has also commented on sales for the beginning of March. SFH sales are below the 9 year average, while listings are above.

Stats to Obsess Over

For the period Mar 1 - 12, 2010:


SFH


Sales

New listings

2010

517

1318

2009

396

931

Historic Avg(9 yrs)

595

1008

2010 compared to historic avg

-13%

+31%


The Edmonton Real Estate Blog reported some dismal sales and listings numbers last week (emphasis mine). They should report this weeks numbers today on their blog.

Here is our update on the Edmonton real estate market. (Previous week's numbers are in brackets). For the past 7 days: Weeklyupdate_2

New listings: 580 (541, 477, 420)
# Sales: 220 (264, 255, 231)
Ratio: 38% (49%, 53%, 55%)
# Price changes: 189 (194, 159, 152)
# Expired/Off Market Listings: 91 (196, 66, 78)
Net loss/gain in listings this week: 269 (81, 156, 111)
Active listings for single family homes: 1947 (1794, 1731, 1641)
Active listings for condos: 1559 (1440, 1391, 1366)

Saturday, January 2, 2010

Calgary: seasonally adjusted sales and 2010 benchmarks

So it is a new year and we should expect sales to ramp up in spring. Over the past few years it has been difficult to differentiate between an actual change in market activity and what is due to seasonal factors. In this post we will find what the seasonal component in monthly sales is and from that determine some benchmarks to compare 2010 sales against.

Below is a chart of Calgary home sales over the past 5 years from Bob Truman's site and a centered 12 month moving average.


Next is a table of seasonal adjustments for each month. This is done by determining the ratio of actual sales and the centered moving average and taking an average for each month. For example the December ratios are marked below and taking the average we can expect December sales to be 62% of "normal" based on seasonal factors. The method is described in detail here.


January 0.79
February 1.01
March 1.19
April 1.2
May 1.25
June 1.26
July 1.03
August 0.99
September 0.91
October 0.84
November 0.81
December 0.62


This factor is "normalized" and applied to the original sales numbers to get seasonally adjusted sales. Also plotted is a six month moving average.

Finally some benchmarks taken from the marked points on the six month seasonally adjusted sales trend. The first benchmark is the monthly sales at a constant seasonally adjusted rate equivalent to the last six months of 2009. This is described as "It's all good". The second is a sales rate equivalent to the six months of the financial crisis between October 2008 to March 2009. This is described in the following chart as "Scorched earth". The last benchmark is at a seasonally adjusted rate equivalent to that from Nov 2006 to April 2007 called "Back to boom".

I will post the same charts for Edmonton when the official sales numbers are available.

*Update*

Radley commented on new listings so I included similar charts to cover that angle. New listings was at least as important to the 2009 recovery as the increase in sales. One of the benchmarks for new listings in 2010 is a seasonally adjusted rate equivalent to the last half of 2009. This represents a relatively low level of new listings and for a market downturn to occur this will need to increase. The other benchmark is the first half of 2008 where sellers were stampeding to the exits.

Monday, February 16, 2009

Inconvenient Stats

Another terrible article from the Calgary Herald. Resale market gathers strength.

Maybe it was the weather, maybe it was wanting to start the new year on an optimistic note, or maybe people were just being spontaneous.

Whatever the reason, as January moved along there seemed to be more open house signs popping up around the city -- and "for sale" signs with "sold" stickers slapped on them.

By the end of the month, January was slightly stronger for sales than December.

There is a predictable seasonal trend with real estate sales. Past years have followed this pattern where sales in January increase over December. Even in weakening markets, such as 2008, sales increase in January. Single family sales from Mike's stats:
Dec'07 846
Jan'08 1083

Dec'08 449
Jan'09 550

The Calgary Real Estate Board says 550 single-detached homes inside the city limits changed hands in January, up from 449 in December.

As well, 225 condominiums were sold, 20 more than the previous month.

Outside the city in the rural communities, sales in January reached 148, up from 113 for December.

"Indeed, it is a tough market (for sellers), but I'm pleased to see sales picking up over December," says CREB president Bonnie Wegerich. "Although numbers are down from January 2008, we are seeing increased activity and more interest from buyers."

Ron Stanners, a past-president for the board and broker/owner of Max-Well South Star Realty, says activity among realtors in his office picked up in January by about 55 per cent from December.

"Sales are up, that's a good sign," he says.

Note that all the sales comparisons are made to last month.

"And the flow of listings has slowed. I think a large number of investors have sold or rented their properties, which is one of the issues that has been affecting the market."

The number of new single-detached resale home listings added to the market last month totalled 2,068, down from 3,023 for the same month a year ago--with the comparative month-end inventories almost unchanged at about 4,000.

The condo inventory also held steady at near 1,900.

"While there's still a good selection of homes to choose from, we are seeing a slow but steady decrease in our inventory," says Wegerich. "As the inventory is reduced, we will see a return to a more stable market."

It is disingenuous to compare sales to last month but inventory and listings to last year. New listings for single family homes from CREB are below showing a large but seasonal monthly increase this January.

Dec'07 984
Jan'08 3023

Dec'08 836
Jan'09 2068

Stanners has been in the business long enough to know there will always be ups and downs, particularly in the Calgary marketplace.

"This market is not that bad -- price declines were minimal from December," says Stanners.

For January, the board reports the average price at $413,049,down from$417,398 in December. The condo average slipped to $270,940, declining from $274,919.

Now we are back to monthly comparisons. Below are average prices from CREB (SFH/Condo)

Dec'07 444,769 / 304,719
Jan'08 455,297 / 311,232

Dec'08 417,398 / 274,919
Jan'09 413,049 / 270,940

But Stanners says that because 2006 and 2007 were so volatile, it's difficult to make comparisons.

He says that 2004 and 2005 were "good years" and compared to them, the 2008 market was only about 20 per cent off.

Here he is comparing the total sales in 2008 to previous years. Using this measure sales are down 27% from 2005 and only 13% from 2004. Source CMHC Housing Market Outlook.

2004: 26,511
2005: 31,569
2006: 33,027
2007: 32,176
2008: 23,136

However, it is worth noting that the market suffered a further deterioration in sales since fall of 2008. Sales this January are down 45% from 2005 levels (Source Mike Fotiou). Also it's not difficult to make comparisons to 2006 and 2007. Watch me. (SFH January sales)

2005: 1002
2006: 1445
2007: 1497
2008: 1083
2009: 550

Sales are down 62% from 2006 and 63% from 2007 levels.

From a financial aspect, Stanners also says buyers should be getting into the market sooner than later.

"If you bought a home today and the price dropped 10 per cent in the next year and mortgage rates went up one per cent, it would still cost you less to buy today -- and you'd have the home paid off a year earlier," he says.

This is false. Lets compare two buyers with 25 year amortizations.

Buyer A

Price $300,000

Down $30,000

Initial Balance $270,000

Initial Rate 4.5%

Payment $1494.38

Buyer B

Price $270,000

Down $30,000

Initial Balance $240,000

Initial Rate 5.5%

Payment $1464.94

For this example assume Buyer A buys immediately and takes out a 5-year fixed and Buyer B waits one year and then takes a 4-year fixed rate (for convenience inthis example). After 5 years both buyers will have similar financing options so we can focus on the outstanding mortgage balance after 5 years and the cost of payments. I will neglect the first year of payments as one buyer would be renting and the other owning and also assume buyer B did not save any additional funds for downpaymnet. The results are below after 5 years (using RBC mortgage calculator):

Buyer A

Total Payments: $71,730 (ignoring year 1)

Outstanding Balance: $237,050

Buyer B

Total Payments: $70,317 (ignoring year 1)

Outstanding Balance: $219,818

The difference would even be greater if renting was cheaper than owning and if buyer B saved for a downpayment in the first year. After this term buyer B could potentially change the amortization time and pay off the mortgage sooner.

Update: Mike Fotiou had made a very similar mortgage comparison here.

Saturday, July 26, 2008

Calgary Market Update

Cheap Post:

Sales price per square foot has decreased in July. For condos and houses the amount paid per square foot has decreased to the lowest point of anytime since Jan 2007. From Mike's stats:

SFH --- July 1-24: $289 ($298) June: $305 ($309)
Condo - July 1-24: $297 ($305) June: $303($309)

Also from Bob Truman's blog Sales continue to improve I would like the point that looking at YOY change only in sales can be confusing.
Single family home sales volume, after being down 34% for the first five months of 2008, showed an 18% drop in June, and July sales are down 12% compared to 2007.
What Bob fails to mention is that some of that difference is attributable to the deteriorating conditions throughout 2007. So while the may have been some seasonal improvement late this spring there is also the fact that we will begin to compare to sales at the beginning of the downturn. See this chart showing how sales in 2007 compared to 2006. Consider also that smaller year over year losses still show year over year losses!

Remember comparing to ridiculous five year averages or ignoring "boom" years when looking at sales this spring? Sorry can't find the links maybe someone can help me out?